Steadicam - First test impressions

May 19, 2011 at 11:53
by Lucent Productions  
In the world of video production, there are countless numbers of crazy/expensive tools and equipment that can give the viewer a different perspective to view the subject. In the sports industry, there has been a huge increase in the past 5 or 6 years with the number of videographers taking advantage of Dollies, cranes, and more recently with the advent of the DSLR, portable camera sliders. These are all great tools that really increase the production value of a video if used properly. I have used (and still use) ALL of the aforementioned tools, but have recently been itching to have something different to give my videos that added variety and unique perspective.

I have been researching Steadicams, stabilizers, flycams...whatever you want to call them. With many of the larger HD cameras, you would need a steadicam with a large bottom arm, hefty weights, and some arms the size of Arnold Schwarzenegger...unless you had a vest which is big $$

Now that I shoot mostly on a Canon 7D, I could now fall into the range of the smaller steadicams that could be properly balanced and operated hand-held without a vest. I usually have to do a lot of hiking to shoot, so the less weight I have to carry around, the better! I stumbled upon the Flycam Nano via the website www.cheesycam.com <---- if you are a DSLR shooter, BOOKMARK THAT SITE!

I purchased the steadicam off eBay and within a few weeks the badboy showed up! The only seller is in India as far as I know, but they will ship international. I think I paid $150 total after shipping to the US....way cheaper than a Merlin Steadicam that sells for over $600.
photo
Here are the pros and cons of the Flycam Nano:
Pros:
- Small in size and can be taken apart for travel.
- Cheap
- Build seems to be of pretty good quality. Mostly anodized parts, and they include extra weights and random screws (always key cause I lose stuff ALL the time)

Cons:
- Weight limitation - With the 7D w/no micrphone and no batter grip, the steadicam is pretty maxed out with an 18-135mm lens. I borrowed a 14mm Canon lens and it was much better. Keep this in mind when purchasing a small steadicam. Cameras like the T2i & 60D would fly much easier since they have less weight to balance.
- Calibration/Adjustment - There are knobs to slide the top carriage back and forth and side-to-side, but the balance really has to be perfect to get it fly smoothly. In my video I didnt have time to perfectly balance the rig and it tells. The first hr and a half you buy one, you will spend balancing it, unless you buy a more expensive steadicam that has micro adjustments on it.

Overall, for the price and size, I think the Flycam Nano is a great tool to add some different shots to your videos. Just be prepared to pull your hair out balancing it (and re-balancing it OFTEN)

Check out the video from my first attempt at using the Flycam Nano at Highland Mountain Bike Park!

Views: 12,728    Faves: 143    Comments: 23


photo

http://www.facebook.com/LucentProductions

Author Info:
lucent avatar

Member since Jul 8, 2005
44 articles

36 Comments
  • 7 0
 I know pink bike is trying to plug for small companies but in a time were money is hard to come by, it's nice to save a bit of money on the smaller thing. You can make one of these for a tenth of the price.
littlegreatideas.com/stabilizer/diy
  • 3 0
 did you just jump into the foam pit, with the hole rig? That was awesome.

regarding the motion sickness: the cam seems to be held very steady in my opinion - great result - riders drop into the frame, leave partially, and come back in...maybe that's what irritates the eyes (and brain).
  • 2 1
 yup jumped right in with everything... I'll add a photo that someone took Smile
  • 1 0
 added the pic, look up!
  • 1 0
 I've been looking into one of those too. The Wondlan Ares seems to be a bang for the buck too. 120 bucks more, but better build quality, and suited for heavier equipment as well. Might give it a try, to do some nice Megavalanche coverage...
  • 1 0
 I saw you write about getting this on Twitter the other day. I assumed it was a big rig though. Im very interested in one of these myself. Having used it would you recommend getting the one with the arm brace too or is it easy to use for a long time without? Thanks, Jack.
  • 1 0
 I haven't done much research on the wrist braces, but you can prob get away with one. But the weight is def noticeable after holding for 30-45 seconds. If you're shooting with a DSLR its still pretty manageable.
  • 1 0
 I'm trying to understand the whole video thing on the 7D - that foam pit scene: I guess you filmed in manual mode, used a high ISO setting, and...defined exposure time over aperture? If so, what exposure time did you use?
  • 1 0
 Shot the foam pit scene at 60fps and converted to 24p.
  • 1 0
 a tip with those mini tripods, i was using one as a handle for my GoPro and got sick of the legs going everywhere, so i slipped a grip over it that i got free in an mtb mag. Heaps more comfy!
  • 2 0
 Pretty sick for a $150 steady cam! I know they can get pricey, but this one looks like it keeps production costs down and quality relatively high.
  • 1 0
 thats sick dude!!! well done!! Salute
  • 3 0
 Built mine for 8 bucks over a year ago and works just as good as a glidecam w/ arm.
With that said, I'd still buy one lol.
  • 1 0
 thanks for posting this i am now looking into buying one of these Smile just wondering, is the one your using the one for DSLR's or HV30's? cheers and awesome video by the way ;P
  • 1 0
 hey, im looking into buying one of these now i've seen your video, would you definitely recommend it? and do you use the DSLR version or the mini camera, HV30 version? thanks, and awesome video by the way Big Grin
  • 1 0
 They list a bunch of flycam nanos with a few different camera's, they're all the same. here's one cgi.ebay.com/Flycam-Nano-Steadycam-Stabilizer-HV30-mini-cameras-/220786744176?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3367ea5b70
  • 1 0
 i'm thinking of building one by myself: www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pLBUC-O1js
that looks so much smoother..
but dunno if my skills are good enough.
  • 1 0
 I ordered mine today, so excited, shipping and everything in it came to 138$ !! i love the fact that you can get shots running that look like cable cam shots
  • 2 0
 I ordered mine too - especially like 00:45...
  • 3 0
 The very last shot with the foam pit was awesome.
  • 1 0
 Great Job...What aperture did you shoot with... i tent to lose focus when using my 7D so i gave up on videos all together, but would love to start at it all over again!
  • 1 0
 i shoot at around f/3.5 with the wide end of my 18-135 lens. The best thing I bought was a Eyecup viewfinder, makes focusing so much easier.
  • 1 0
 Hey, what type of eyecup viewfinder do you use?
I'm looking for one for my 7D as well.
  • 1 0
 About to leave for mexico, send me a message and I'll get you info.
  • 1 0
 I've got the same steadicam, it works pretty good, and I dont have a DSLR either, just a HD camera.
  • 1 0
 those things are sick. The shots you get are amazing.. it is a new look what you can do with filming.
  • 1 0
 nice tip! first time to actually find out of such a thing/gadget. i hope to find more tips/gadgets in the future.
  • 2 0
 I thought it looked great.
  • 1 3
 The motion of the camera in those shots gives me motion sickness. The way that it waves around fames it hard to focus for me. Seems more like a practice with the steadicam issue than the fact that you are using one though
  • 2 0
 as stated, this was my first time shooting with the steadicam. I agreed that with more practice (and more time fine tuning the balance) it will be even smoother.
  • 1 0
 what version of heartbeats is this :o
  • 1 0
 I am no expert in image but I thought the great video.
  • 1 0
 Like the music. Real nice video also. Sharp.
  • 1 0
 It works great for less than $ 200 bucks... name of the song?
  • 1 0
 nice work
  • 1 1
 VOD?!







Copyright © 2000 - 2024. Pinkbike.com. All rights reserved.
dv42 0.028997
Mobile Version of Website